Scots-Irish: Trying to Explain JD Vance

-

I’ve been interested to note that the Republican Vice-Presidential candidate, J D Vance, is frequently described as “Scots-Irish.”

I was unfamiliar with that term or the people it described until, during seminary, I served an internship at several small Presbyterian Churches in the Susquehanna Valley and Catskill Mountains of southern New York. There I met the hard-bitten Scots-Irish, most of whom were dairy farmers, struggling to make ends meet on small farms on very rocky, mountainous soil.

The Scots-Irish came from the Scottish lowlands to Northern Ireland, Ulster. In the 18th century they migrated in two waves to North America. Many came to maintain their Calvinist Presbyterian identity in the face of the efforts of the British King to force them into the Church of England.

Arriving in the colonies in the 18th century, they were relative late comers who found the coastal areas already settled. This pushed them into the mountainous regions of the Alleghenies from southern New York, into Pennsylvania, Ohio, Kentucky and as far south as Georgia and South Carolina.

They didn’t have the choice land of the plantation owners and were on what was then the frontier. As a consequence they were often in conflict with Native Americans. They acquired a reputation as combative, loyal to kin and distrustful of government, characteristics that were highlighted in U.S. Senator Jim Webb’s 2004 book about the Scots-Irish, Born Fighting. 

The small church I was serving had only recently abandoned its longtime Calvinist practice of a Thursday service of penance preparatory to the Sunday service of Communion. To be admitted to the three-times-a-year service of Holy Communion you had to present a small, smooth stone that was evidence of your participation in the service of confession and penance on the prior Thursday. Celebration of communion more than three times a year was considered “extravagant.”

Pastoral calling was a big thing there. I went out to visit people on their farms, standing in barns, sitting at kitchen tables. Showing up and listening during the week earned you the right to speak on Sunday. I learned that the barn and other outbuildings, were the domain of the husband, although wives could be found there to help with milking. Inside the house was the woman’s domain, with the men entering for meals and to sleep. For dairy farmers, there are no “days-off.”

During one such pastoral call, a family of seven were at the table for their mid-day meal. I pulled a chair alongside and engaged in conversation with the married couple, their 3 or 4 children, and a bachelor uncle, Clarence. Clarence, in faded denim coveralls, face unshaven, was maybe 50. He said not a word, until, at one point I used the word, “Sunday.” Maybe I had used it several times. Suddenly, Clarence brought his fist crashing down on the table, setting all the tableware jumping, and said in stern, gravelly voice, “In my day, we called it “The Sabbath!” “Yes sir,” I likely said, ” that’s right, the Sabbath.”

On another occasion, when a guest preacher at a different but neighboring church, I apparently lost the congregation the moment I took off my suit coat and loosened my tie — it was a hot August day — and preached in my shirtsleeves. Disrespectful to the Lord.

The Scots-Irish I came to know were also tight with a dollar. The big achievement of my year in their midst was to preside over the installation of a toilet inside the church building. Until then — this was 1975 — an outhouse would do. And this was country where the winter was long and harsh.

Still, I admired the people I came to know. They worked very hard. While they didn’t say much, they could be quite wryly humorous. They were loyal to family and uncomplaining. They would help you when you needed it. On more than one occasion that year a farmer used his tractor to pull our late-model car out of a snowy ditch.

They were wonderful singers, who sang in parts and harmony. For special evening services the church was lit by chandeliers that were lowered on a cable so the ascending circles of tiny oil lamps could be lit by hand. It made for a breathtakingly, beautiful evening in a simple wooden building where the maple and hickory pews had been polished by years of worship and prayer.

And they taught me a good deal about the ministry. I had come from sophisticated New York City, full of new ideas and full, no doubt, of myself. They weren’t much interested in “the latest” from seminary or from a young seminarian. What they wanted to know, when they came to church, was “Is there a Word from the Lord?” which is in fact the right question. When life is tough you don’t need some twenty-something’s bright ideas. You need a word from the Lord that will keep you going for another week.

So describing Vance as Scots-Irish, for those in the know, is saying more than just a footnote about ethnic background. It signaling the characteristics of a tribe: feisty, ready for a fight, and distrustful of government. Give him this much, he comes by it honestly.

Anthony B. Robinson
Anthony B. Robinsonhttps://www.anthonybrobinson.com/
Tony is a writer, teacher, speaker and ordained minister (United Church of Christ). He served as Senior Minister of Seattle’s Plymouth Congregational Church for fourteen years. His newest book is Useful Wisdom: Letters to Young (and not so young) Ministers. He divides his time between Seattle and a cabin in Wallowa County of northeastern Oregon. If you’d like to know more or receive his regular blogs in your email, go to his site listed above to sign-up.

8 COMMENTS

  1. The good news is this:

    By choosing J. D. Vance as his running mate, Donald Trump delivered us a gift:

    It has the cacophonous effect of tying an empty can to the rear bumper of his campaign, only to clink and clatter as it moves on.

  2. It is true that Trump did us a favor choosing Vance instead of balancing the GOP ticket to give it more appeal. Do we really need two guys from the same playground?

  3. And, honestly, what about the hypocrite Vance: the name changer, the Yalie who hates elites, the fake hillbilly who hates hillbillies, the anti-emigrant who married an elite emigrant, the tool of a corporate billionaire who bought him a job in Silicon Valley and a seat in the Senate (thanks to Citizens United), the ass-kissing chameleon who compared Trump to Hitler??

  4. Not sure I get it – are we supposed to see some likeness between this man and the farming community members sketched here? Like, now I get JD Vance, because deep down inside this venture capitalist Catholic MAGA politician there’s a struggling Presbyterian dairy farmer?

  5. A part of the backcountry immigration, west of the Appalachians was not just Scotch-Irish but also German stock. There were two great waves of early migration: the English to the coast (very different, with Puritans from East England, and aristocratic types from other parts of England to Charleston), followed by the Scotch-Irish and Germans to the interior, and later by the Irish to Boston. A lot of the Scotch migrants went first to Canada. One advantage of the German migrants is that they knew a lot more about farming than the British.

  6. Spent time in the area, where my dad was a government map-maker. My mother, the English teacher, used to say that she could hear almost pure Shakespeare English at times as well as tunes and lyrics straight from the old country.

  7. The British writer, Jeanette Winterson, who grew up working class and in a mining community said her parents, despite being poor, had two texts Shakespeare and the King James Version of the Bible. And because of that their lives weren’t poor. With educational “reform” and mass culture they lost those texts and then were truly poor.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Comments Policy

Please be respectful. No personal attacks. Your comment should add something to the topic discussion or it will not be published. All comments are reviewed before being published. Comments are the opinions of their contributors and not those of Post alley or its editors.

Popular

Recent