The New Republicanism: “Illiberal” Democracy

-

Americans are used to hearing that this is the most important election of their lifetime. It’s the real thing this year, or the end of what Republican Vice Presidential nominee J.D. Vance calls the “late republican period,” and a political reversal on a broad scale.

If the Trump restoration succeeds, a President Donald Trump and Vice President Vance are clear in their direction: They intend to barrel through the balance of powers that has sustained America’s government for more than two centuries.

The Republican ticket agrees that a strongman is needed and required to win America’s culture war. The presidential nominee has spoken of the need for “termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution.”  The running mate would, in his words, “seize the administrative state for our own purposes.”

These people are serious. They have taken the Republican Party on a 180-degree turn from the familiar small-government conservatism. In the words of Sen. Vance, spoken on a podcast, “If we are going to push back against (liberalism), we have to get pretty wild, pretty far out there, and go in directions that a lot of conservatives right now are uncomfortable with.”

That discomfort is not hard to see. The main street conservatives tuning into the Trump-Elon Musk conversation on Monday night heard “the Donald” speak highly of Vladimir Putin, Xi Jinping, and Kim Jong Un, saying: “They’re at the top of their game. They’re smart, they’re vicious, and they’re going to protect their country.”

“Getting on well with them” is “not a bad thing,” Trump added. Vance, who describes himself as a “post-liberal conservative Catholic,” has spoken highly of Hungary’s authoritarian ruler Viktor Orban and has said we should “fire every civil servant in the administrative state and replace them with our people.”

Former Rep. Liz Cheney, a steadfast small-government conservative who voted to impeach Trump, has put it bluntly: “No honest person can now deny that Trump is an enemy of the Constitution.” 

The Haven Hamilton character, a country music singer in the great 1970s movie Nashville, delivered a signature lyric: “We must be doing something right to last 200 years.” Of course, we had the Civil War. But our system of government has endured thanks to separation of powers, enlightened adjustment, and acceptance of the verdict of voters. Or as Democratic prankster Dick Tuck put it on losing a state senate race in California, “The people have spoken – the bastards.”

In Britain, Winston Churchill put it more elegantly and memorably in 1947, two years after being bounced from power: “Indeed, it has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except for all those other forms that have been tried from time to time.”

On this side of The Pond, our democracy has worked to expand individual liberties and protect individual rights, at least until recently. American society has grown more inclusive, more pluralistic, thanks to four social forces. All rose out of the citizenry. All spoke truth to power and attained power. They were, and are:

  • The Civil Rights movement opened the American dream to African Americans, securing the right to vote and economic opportunity. The country has elected and reelected a Black man as president and is about to see a woman of African and South Asian ancestry nominated for its highest office.
  • The LGBTQ movement has lifted gay and lesbian Americans out of ostracism, given them the right to marry those they love, and secured – in much of the nation – protection against discrimination. American society has become more inclusive, especially among millennials and Generation Z.
  • The women’s movement has opened the workplace, opened a choice of lifestyle and direction, and made strides toward equal rights and opportunity. We can now say a woman’s place is in the house — the House of Representatives.
  • The environmental movement has pushed back against those ravaging the planet. We’ve seen passage of a Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, National Environmental Policy Act, Endangered Species Act and Wilderness Act. Slowly – although too slowly – a clean energy revolution is taking hold. Coal plants are closing. Solar and wind energy are expanding.

Our 21st Century culture warriors, however, are pushing back. A foreign leader who has influenced Vance, Hungary’s Orban, has a phrase for it – “illiberal democracy.” Its tenets include severe limits to immigration, rejection of critical race theory, state control of university curriculum, opposition to same-sex marriage, and more families with more children.  Vance has gone so far as to advocate giving parents extra votes, one for each child.

The goal, as defined by University of Notre Dame political science professor Patrick Deneen, is “the peaceful overthrow of a corrupt and corrupting liberal ruling class.”  He, too, is a Vance buddy. Deneen argues for bringing “a fundamentally different ethos” to America, with a “common-good conservatism” supplanting the current emphasis on individual liberties.

The goal is overthrow of what social critic (and sometime Seattle resident) Christopher Rufo calls “liberal totalitarianism.” Such a “regime change” will require, in Deneen’s words, “the very robust exercise of political power.”  Or to quote Vice Presidential nominee candidate Vance, “Culture war is class war.” 

Goodbye, small government. Hello, exercise of power from the top down. Donald Trump will make this possible but understand little of it. This enabler’s agenda is simply vengeance. He will sit in the dining room off the Oval Office, watch Fox News, accept plaudits from right wing pundits, and use Truth Social or X to fire Cabinet secretaries. 

Is this what is meant by making America great again?

Joel Connelly
Joel Connelly
I worked for Seattle Post-Intelligencer from 1973 until it ceased print publication in 2009, and SeattlePI.com from 2009 to 6/30/2020. During that time, I wrote about 9 presidential races, 11 Canadian and British Columbia elections‎, four doomed WPPSS nuclear plants, six Washington wilderness battles, creation of two national Monuments (Hanford Reach and San Juan Islands), a 104 million acre Alaska Lands Act, plus the Columbia Gorge National Scenic Area.

7 COMMENTS

  1. I get that Post Alley is a G-rated website, Joel, but you left out the F Word — Fascism. Let’s not sugar-coat it. These people are fascist reactionaries, and we defy them.

    • Suit yourself, you socialist. Poorly defined labels don’t really help us sort out what’s going on. The wikipedia article on Fascism goes on for pages with different takes on what it means. Connelly isn’t sugar coating it, he just left out some meaningless flag-waving.

      What he’s doing that needs to be done, is keeping them on the record with the things they’ve said. Which they will naturally deny when they’re inconvenient, or pretend were just misunderstood rhetorical flourishes or whatever. But even if they would do none of this if actually elected, it’s a catastrophe inasmuch as when the electorate puts its stamp of approval on rolling back modern democracy, we’re headed for trouble sooner or later.

      • Wow! Spoken like one of Tom Tomorrow’s cartoon pundits! Unlike you, I don’t have to run to Wikipedia to know fascism when I see it.

  2. And yet, pushing the democracy-at-stake is a losing issue for the Democrats; voters seem to be a lot more concerned with inflation. This looks similar to people in Cold War Eastern Europe saying, “As long as the trains run on time …”?

  3. Projection: sociological phenomenon where members one group accuse members of another group of acting in a manner that they themselves are engaging in, often to divert attention from their own behavior (particularly common among groups living with high levels of fear/resentment). Source: Urban Dictionary

    Increasingly, Biden Admin has the look and feel of an interregnum. As in Oliver Cromwell’s time, leaders of this interregnum have sought to impose an absolute conformity, they have weaponized government, and their legitimacy has, from the start, been arguably suspect.

    Note. An interregnum is a period between the end of one person’s time as ruler or leader and the coming to power of the next ruler or leader. Collins Dictionary

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Comments Policy

Please be respectful. No personal attacks. Your comment should add something to the topic discussion or it will not be published. All comments are reviewed before being published. Comments are the opinions of their contributors and not those of Post alley or its editors.

Popular

Recent