Recently I read the in-print conversation between David Brooks and Bret Stephens in the pages of New York Times. It was titled, “The Party’s Over For Us: Where Do We Go Now?”
Both Brooks and Stephens have identified as conservative, and to some extent with the Republican Party — at least in the past. So “the party” that’s over isn’t some wild “party” in the usual sense of the term, but a political party — and to be specific, the Republican Party. That Party is over, at least for Brooks and Stephens, and, I would imagine, millions more.
The political party they identified with is utterly gone. The political figures that inspired them, whether historical figures like Hamilton, Lincoln, and Theodore Roosevelt, or more recent leaders like Ronald Reagan, Jack Kemp, and John McCain bear not even a remote resemblance to today’s Republicans like Donald Trump, Kevin McCarthy, Lauren Bobert, Matt Gaetz, and Majorie Taylor Greene.
Brooks and Stephens have been orphaned, politically speaking. They are adrift. Asking, “where do we go now?”
What struck me most about their conversation, almost a kind of wake, was that I don’t think this sense of bewilderment and alienation is limited to these two or to Republicans or even the two political parties. My hunch that experience of being adrift, cut off from one’s moorings, is far broader than the fate of the Republican Party and those who once found a home in it.
I wonder if there aren’t a whole lot of people today who feel orphaned, who are asking, “where do we go now?” These are people who feel as if institutions and values in which they invested their lives have pretty much disappeared or that those institutions have morphed into something they can no longer recognize.
I hear it when people talk about the college or university that is their alma mater and to which they have contributed financially, and often in other ways, over many years. The values for which their school stood seem to have changed so significantly that the school is no longer recognizable to its former graduates.
I hear it among people in professions like journalism, medicine, and the law, many of whom cannot wait to resign or retire, because the profession they got into 30 or 40 years ago seems to have changed so radically that they hardly recognize it and no longer feel a part of it.
I hear it from people who had for years found a home in a particular church and religious denomination. They look at the current iteration of the church or that denomination and ask, “Where do we go now?”
Now it may be that this is simply the predictable lament of people who have grown older (I’m guessing Brooks and Stephens are both somewhere in the neighborhood of 60). That this is simply the regular and repeating experience of people as they age, as they lose power and place, and others take their place — and their power. Undoubtedly, there is some of that.
But to return to Brooks and Stephens, as one illustration, it doesn’t exactly seem that the issue here is simply those who are younger replacing those who are older in the GOP. It is that there is no longer even a family resemblance between the Republican Party of the last 100 years and those who have recently taken over the U.S. Congress.
“Part of the problem,” comments Stephens, “is that so many Republicans no longer get into politics to pass legislation. They do it to become celebrities. The more feverish they are, the better it sells.” Another way to put that is that at least some of those in leadership roles today don’t actually care much about the institutions they are part of, even in which they may even be leaders. In some instances, they call to simply to tear the thing down or they celebrate its decline. Their loyalty, such as it is, is to their own brand.
So it isn’t just Brooks and Stephens for whom “the party is over.” There are lots of us these days who feel adrift, without institutional home and kindred, and who are asking, “where do we go now?”
No Republican should be surprised at the evolution of the Republican Party.
Reagan started it.
He’s the man who gave credence to the idea that we should be scared of government. He was a very effective communicator, and he gave voice to political nihilism.
I also read that column by Brooks and Stephens. I am currently researching and writing a book about 19th century American history. As I do so, I am struck by the time correspondence between the Second Great Awakening (roughly 1790-1840) in America and the Industrial Revolution in Britain and the U.S. One thesis I am developing is that religious ferment in the U.K. and American fell on fertile soil because so many people were spiritually, socially and economically unmoored by the shift from agrarian to industrial production, rural to urban living. I see a parallel between then and now. I agree with you, Stephens and Brooks that we now have widespread bewilderment, fear and alienation in our society. One of the many thoughts I have when I walk by a homeless or addicted person in downtown Seattle (every five feet it seems) is “Where are your roots? Why has a moral and spiritual foundation for your life gone so badly missing?” I doubt that revival meetings and novel religious sects are going to cut it today.
Yeah, poor us. This sounds like a bad country song played on a jukebox in a honky tonk. “She left me cryin’ for a no-good rounder from Laramie.” Can’t depend on the Party anymore. Or the church or those damned university professors or anybody else. How about looking at ourselves? We might find out what we really think and believe.
Yes, Reagan did seem to kind of get the ball rolling, downhill of course.
Yes, it’s the society that turns to these “leaders” – Brooks and his friends can’t get the old Republican party back, because it doesn’t sell any more. The people buy resentment, and the reasons why probably go back to Reagan as well to some extent.
But you never know, they might buy a genuine conservative policy perspective, if conservative didn’t have to mean irresponsible exploitation, if it didn’t have to mean lies and resentment. All we have to do is reform election processes to make 3rd parties viable, break the back of social media and its bubble problem, and maybe a few other major changes.
Also read Brooks and Stephens and resonated with me.
I no longer recognize the Democrat party – Jack and Bobby Kennedy, Hubert Humphrey, Scoop, Lyndon and others.
Yet I am still a Democrat – yearning to register as an “Independent” – because I believe it’s core values still resonate with me.
Things change and I get it yet if I could “beam” myself back to an earlier time would do so in a nano second.
Good luck future generations. We built a pretty good Country and like Franklin, “hope you can keep it.”
Since we have no party registration in Washington State, you can feel free to call yourself an Independent any time. No one will notice.
BTW, we don’t call ourselves the Democrat Party. It’s an offensive slur made by Republicans.